Hippeastrum puniceum (Lam.) Voss

Horticultural & Botanical History

First botanically described by Lamark in 1783 as Amaryllis punicea [Encycl. vol.1, p.122/1783], although Linnaeus had mentioned this plant under the name of Amaryllis dubia in 1775, a name now considered invalid [Pl. Surinam p.39/1775]. In his monograph Amaryllidaceae William Herbert proposed the genus Hippeastrum for many of the larger flowered Amaryllids from the Americas, and described this plant under the specific names of equestre and barbatum [Herbert p.138/1837]. Voss proposed the correct specific name puniceum in 1895 [Vilm. Blumengärtn. ed. 3, vol.1, p.1033/1895], the name now generally accepted.

‘It flowers towards the end of April.  The flowering stem rises above the foliage, to the height of about a foot or more, produces from one to three flowers, similar to, but not quite so large as those of the Mexican Amaryllis [Hippeastrum reginae (L.) Herb.], to which it is nearly related; it differs however from that plant essentially in this, that the lower part of the flower projects further than the upper, which gives its mouth that obliquity which Linnaeus describes.’  [BM t.305/1795].  Figured also at BM t.2315/1822 as H. spathaceum, although this latter plant is almost certainly a hybrid.  Introduced to Britain in 1710.  [JD].

History at Camden Park

Hippeastrum equestre was recorded as received per ‘Sovereign’ February 1831.  [MP A2948].  It may have been lost as it was included among desiderata to Loddiges’ Nursery, 6th January 1845.  [MP A2933-2, p.28].

Notes